Named local schemes and plans, with the responsible body and the latest stage established by the source checked. A proposal, funding announcement and completed project are different things.
Ebury Bridge estate, City of Westminster
Ebury Bridge: second phase
The next estate renewal phase is intended to provide replacement and additional homes.
Development agreements approved · evidence dated 2026-10-02
Responsible body: Westminster City Council and Westminster Housing Developments Limited
Latest evidence: The published decision approves development and lease agreements enabling the second phase. It is an authorisation to progress the scheme, not evidence that homes are completed or occupied.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No official project-to-ward mapping has been verified; no ward allocation is inferred from a city or street name.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Ebury Phase 2 — Development Agreements →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Keep estate residents’ needs central as renewal phases progress →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Church Street Site A, City of Westminster
Church Street: Site A redevelopment
Estate renewal plans combine homes with improvements to the surrounding neighbourhood.
Demolition complete; enabling works reported started · evidence dated 2026-01-29
Responsible body: Westminster City Council and delivery partners
Latest evidence: The January budget report records demolition completed in autumn 2025 and enabling works starting in January 2026. It does not establish completion of replacement homes; future budget allocations are not treated as final costs.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No official project-to-ward mapping has been verified; no ward allocation is inferred from a city or street name.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Budget scrutiny: key projects over the next five years →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Keep estate residents’ needs central as renewal phases progress →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Social homes across the City of Westminster
Social-home energy upgrades
More than 2,000 social homes have received energy improvements over recent years. Funding and plans cover around 4,000 more households, which are not yet counted as completed.
More than 2,000 homes reported improved; further upgrades planned · evidence dated 2026-01-22
Responsible body: Westminster City Council
Latest evidence: The January update reports improvements at more than 2,000 social homes over the preceding years, plus plans and funding for around 4,000 additional households. Measures vary by home. Its illustrative savings are not a measured average for every household.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- Unmapped: the named sites or programme area have not been matched to the ward boundaries used by these statistics. No ward-wide effect is inferred.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Westminster City Council delivers more than 2,000 home retrofits →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Check that Westminster’s energy upgrades deliver warmer homes →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →What this local evidence covers
18 of 18 wards
Have at least one valid census comparison with the whole council. Missing measures stay visible.
Read the neighbourhood evidence →3 reviewed plans and projects
3 have a source-dated stage; 0 have some funding evidence; 0 have some cost evidence. These counts do not prove that funding or costs are complete.
Check each project →0 verified ward links
Project locations cannot be treated as a map of who benefits. Each record explains any verified ward association.
Read the sources and limits →What is still missing
The reviewed local schemes are a selected evidence collection, not a complete council capital programme.
Current service capacity, incomes, waiting lists, school demand and project outcomes need additional verified local evidence before firm claims can be made.
Project locations have not been matched to official ward boundaries. No ward-specific delivery claims are inferred.
Costs, funding and benefits are only reported where the selected official evidence states them; blank fields are not zero.
The 2,000-home figure is cumulative over several years, not an annual count. The additional 4,000 households are planned, and the source does not give a measured average bill saving.
